I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Сайт Роскомнадзора атаковали18:00，更多细节参见爱思助手下载最新版本
Цены на нефть взлетели до максимума за полгода17:55，推荐阅读快连下载-Letsvpn下载获取更多信息
Последние новости。WPS下载最新地址是该领域的重要参考